Sample, computation vs storage tradeoffs for classification using tensor subspace models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we exhibit the tradeoffs between the (training) sample, computation and storage complexity for the problem of supervised classification using signal subspace estimation. Our main tool is the use of tensor subspaces, i.e. subspaces with a Kronecker structure, for embedding the data into lower dimensions. Among the subspaces with a Kronecker structure, we show that using subspaces with a hierarchical structure for representing data leads to improved tradeoffs. One of the main reasons for the improvement is that embedding data into these hierarchical Kronecker structured subspaces prevents overfitting at higher latent dimensions.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.
- 2023Tensor PCA from basis in tensor spacecited by 0
- 2023Decomposition of linear tensor transformationscited by 0
- 2023Decomposition of linear tensor transformations14 Sep 2023
- 2023Tensor PCA from basis in tensor space11 Apr 2023