mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Semantic Relatedness From Human Feedback Using Metric Learning

arXiv 1705.07425 ↗First posted 21 May 2017cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Assessing the degree of semantic relatedness between words is an important task with a variety of semantic applications, such as ontology learning for the Semantic Web, semantic search or query expansion. To accomplish this in an automated fashion, many relatedness measures have been proposed. However, most of these metrics only encode information contained in the underlying corpus and thus do not directly model human intuition. To solve this, we propose to utilize a metric learning approach to improve existing semantic relatedness measures by learning from additional information, such as explicit human feedback. For this, we argue to use word embeddings instead of traditional high-dimensional vector representations in order to leverage their semantic density and to reduce computational cost. We rigorously test our approach on several domains including tagging data as well as publicly available embeddings based on Wikipedia texts and navigation. Human feedback about semantic relatedness for learning and evaluation is extracted from publicly available datasets such as MEN or WS-353. We find that our method can significantly improve semantic relatedness measures by learning from additional information, such as explicit human feedback. For tagging data, we are the first to generate and study embeddings. Our results are of special interest for ontology and recommendation engineers, but also for any other researchers and practitioners of Semantic Web techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 3 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2017.

Builds on

3 of 32 references.

References · 3

  1. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
  2. 2015LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embeddingcited by 582
  3. 2016Counter-fitting Word Vectors to Linguistic Constraintscited by 140

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SAGE: A Realistic Benchmark for Semantic Understanding
  2. 2026Semantic Search At LinkedIn
  3. 2026Beyond Cosine Similarity: Taming Semantic Drift and Antonym Intrusion in a 15-Million Node Turkish Synonym Graph
  4. 2026CORE: Comprehensive Ontological Relation Evaluation for Large Language Models
  5. 2025Large Scale Retrieval for the LinkedIn Feed using Causal Language Models
  6. 2023Word Sense Induction with Knowledge Distillation from BERT
  7. 2023Revisiting Relation Extraction in the era of Large Language Models
  8. 2026RelateAnything: Real-Time Open-Vocabulary Relation Prediction From Any Inputs