Transforming Bell's Inequalities into State Classifiers with Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum information science has profoundly changed the ways we understand, store, and process information. A major challenge in this field is to look for an efficient means for classifying quantum state. For instance, one may want to determine if a given quantum state is entangled or not. However, the process of a complete characterization of quantum states, known as quantum state tomography, is a resource-consuming operation in general. An attractive proposal would be the use of Bell's inequalities as an entanglement witness, where only partial information of the quantum state is needed. The problem is that entanglement is necessary but not sufficient for violating Bell's inequalities, making it an unreliable state classifier. Here we aim at solving this problem by the methods of machine learning. More precisely, given a family of quantum states, we randomly picked a subset of it to construct a quantum-state classifier, accepting only partial information of each quantum state. Our results indicated that these transformed Bell-type inequalities can perform significantly better than the original Bell's inequalities in classifying entangled states. We further extended our analysis to three-qubit and four-qubit systems, performing classification of quantum states into multiple species. These results demonstrate how the tools in machine learning can be applied to solving problems in quantum information science.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 May 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2025Artificial intelligence for representing and characterizing quantum systemscited by 10
- 2021Detecting quantum entanglement with unsupervised learningcited by 9
- 2023Multimodal deep representation learning for quantum cross-platform verificationcited by 9
- 2022Toward Physically Realizable Quantum Neural Networkscited by 8
- 2025Rethink the Role of Deep Learning towards Large-scale Quantum Systemscited by 4
- 2022Learning entanglement breakdown as a phase transition by confusioncited by 2
- 2022Identification of quantum entanglement with Siamese convolutional neural networks and semi-supervised learningcited by 2
- 2021Building separable approximations for quantum states via neural networkscited by 1
- 2024New Bounds on Quantum Sample Complexity of Measurement Classescited by 0
- 2025On the Generalization Limits of Quantum Generative Adversarial Networks with Pure State Generatorscited by 0
- 2025Entanglement Detection with Quantum-inspired Kernels and SVMscited by 0
- 2026The Bell Boundary of Shared Representationscited by 0
- 2026The Bell Boundary of Shared Representations12 Oct 2026
- 2025Artificial intelligence for representing and characterizing quantum systems5 Sep 2025
- 2025Entanglement Detection with Quantum-inspired Kernels and SVMs25 Aug 2025
- 2025On the Generalization Limits of Quantum Generative Adversarial Networks with Pure State Generators13 Aug 2025
- 2025Rethink the Role of Deep Learning towards Large-scale Quantum Systems20 May 2025
- 2024New Bounds on Quantum Sample Complexity of Measurement Classes22 Aug 2024
- 2023Multimodal deep representation learning for quantum cross-platform verification7 Nov 2023
- 2022Identification of quantum entanglement with Siamese convolutional neural networks and semi-supervised learning13 Oct 2022
- 2022Toward Physically Realizable Quantum Neural Networks22 Mar 2022
- 2022Learning entanglement breakdown as a phase transition by confusion1 Feb 2022
- 2021Building separable approximations for quantum states via neural networks15 Dec 2021
- 2021Detecting quantum entanglement with unsupervised learning8 Mar 2021