Scalable Planning with Tensorflow for Hybrid Nonlinear Domains
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given recent deep learning results that demonstrate the ability to effectively optimize high-dimensional non-convex functions with gradient descent optimization on GPUs, we ask in this paper whether symbolic gradient optimization tools such as Tensorflow can be effective for planning in hybrid (mixed discrete and continuous) nonlinear domains with high dimensional state and action spaces? To this end, we demonstrate that hybrid planning with Tensorflow and RMSProp gradient descent is competitive with mixed integer linear program (MILP) based optimization on piecewise linear planning domains (where we can compute optimal solutions) and substantially outperforms state-of-the-art interior point methods for nonlinear planning domains. Furthermore, we remark that Tensorflow is highly scalable, converging to a strong plan on a large-scale concurrent domain with a total of 576,000 continuous action parameters distributed over a horizon of 96 time steps and 100 parallel instances in only 4 minutes. We provide a number of insights that clarify such strong performance including observations that despite long horizons, RMSProp avoids both the vanishing and exploding gradient problems. Together these results suggest a new frontier for highly scalable planning in nonlinear hybrid domains by leveraging GPUs and the power of recent advances in gradient descent with highly optimized toolkits like Tensorflow.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2022pyRDDLGym: From RDDL to Gym Environmentscited by 8
- 2021Gradient-Based Mixed Planning with Symbolic and Numeric Action Parameterscited by 6
- 2024Optimal Control of Renewable Energy Communities subject to Network Peak Fees with Model Predictive Control and Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 4
- 2022Sample-efficient Iterative Lower Bound Optimization of Deep Reactive Policies for Planning in Continuous MDPscited by 2
- 2021RAPTOR: End-to-end Risk-Aware MDP Planning and Policy Learning by Backpropagationcited by 0
- 2024Constraint-Generation Policy Optimization (CGPO): Nonlinear Programming for Policy Optimization in Mixed Discrete-Continuous MDPscited by 0
- 2024A Metric Hybrid Planning Approach to Solving Pandemic Planning Problems with Simple SIR Modelscited by 0
- 2026Model-Driven Policy Optimization in Differentiable Simulators via Stochastic Explorationcited by 0
- 2026Model-Driven Policy Optimization in Differentiable Simulators via Stochastic Exploration8 May 2026
- 2024A Metric Hybrid Planning Approach to Solving Pandemic Planning Problems with Simple SIR Models18 Sep 2024
- 2024Optimal Control of Renewable Energy Communities subject to Network Peak Fees with Model Predictive Control and Reinforcement Learning Algorithms29 Jan 2024
- 2024Constraint-Generation Policy Optimization (CGPO): Nonlinear Programming for Policy Optimization in Mixed Discrete-Continuous MDPs20 Jan 2024
- 2022pyRDDLGym: From RDDL to Gym Environments11 Nov 2022
- 2022Sample-efficient Iterative Lower Bound Optimization of Deep Reactive Policies for Planning in Continuous MDPs23 Mar 2022
- 2021Gradient-Based Mixed Planning with Symbolic and Numeric Action Parameters19 Oct 2021
- 2021RAPTOR: End-to-end Risk-Aware MDP Planning and Policy Learning by Backpropagation14 Jun 2021