An Aposteriorical Clusterability Criterion for k-Means++ and Simplicity of Clustering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We define the notion of a well-clusterable data set combining the point of view of the objective of k-means clustering algorithm (minimising the centric spread of data elements) and common sense (clusters shall be separated by gaps). We identify conditions under which the optimum of k-means objective coincides with a clustering under which the data is separated by predefined gaps. We investigate two cases: when the whole clusters are separated by some gap and when only the cores of the clusters meet some separation condition. We overcome a major obstacle in using clusterability criteria due to the fact that known approaches to clusterability checking had the disadvantage that they are related to the optimal clustering which is NP hard to identify. Compared to other approaches to clusterability, the novelty consists in the possibility of an a posteriori (after running k-means) check if the data set is well-clusterable or not. As the k-means algorithm applied for this purpose has polynomial complexity so does therefore the appropriate check. Additionally, if k-means++ fails to identify a clustering that meets clusterability criteria, with high probability the data is not well-clusterable.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2.
3 papers.
- 2022High-Dimensional Wide Gap k-Means Versus Clustering Axiomscited by 0
- 2023Are Easy Data Easy (for K-Means)cited by 0
- 2023Wide Gaps and Clustering Axiomscited by 0
- 2023Wide Gaps and Clustering Axioms7 Aug 2023
- 2023Are Easy Data Easy (for K-Means)2 Aug 2023
- 2022High-Dimensional Wide Gap k-Means Versus Clustering Axioms30 Nov 2022