mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Quantitative Hardness of CVP

arXiv 1704.03928 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2017cs.CC cs.DScited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

newcommandepsvarepsilon newcommandproblem[1]ensuremath#1 newcommandCVPproblemCVP newcommandSVPproblemSVP newcommandCVPPproblemCVPP newcommandensuremath[1]#1 For odd integers p ≥ 1 (and p = ∞), we show that the Closest Vector Problem in the ℓp norm (CVPp) over rank n lattices cannot be solved in 2(1-eps) n time for any constant eps > 0 unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) fails. We then extend this result to "almost all" values of p ≥ 1, not including the even integers. This comes tantalizingly close to settling the quantitative time complexity of the important special case of CVP2 (i.e., CVP in the Euclidean norm), for which a 2n +o(n)-time algorithm is known. In particular, our result applies for any p = p(n) neq 2 that approaches 2 as n → ∞. We also show a similar SETH-hardness result for SVP_∞; hardness of approximating CVPp to within some constant factor under the so-called Gap-ETH assumption; and other quantitative hardness results for CVPp and CVPPp for any 1 ≤ p < ∞ under different assumptions.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1.

2 papers.