A Multi-view Context-aware Approach to Android Malware Detection and Malicious Code Localization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing Android malware detection approaches use a variety of features such as security sensitive APIs, system calls, control-flow structures and information flows in conjunction with Machine Learning classifiers to achieve accurate detection. Each of these feature sets provides a unique semantic perspective (or view) of apps' behaviours with inherent strengths and limitations. Meaning, some views are more amenable to detect certain attacks but may not be suitable to characterise several other attacks. Most of the existing malware detection approaches use only one (or a selected few) of the aforementioned feature sets which prevent them from detecting a vast majority of attacks. Addressing this limitation, we propose MKLDroid, a unified framework that systematically integrates multiple views of apps for performing comprehensive malware detection and malicious code localisation. The rationale is that, while a malware app can disguise itself in some views, disguising in every view while maintaining malicious intent will be much harder. MKLDroid uses a graph kernel to capture structural and contextual information from apps' dependency graphs and identify malice code patterns in each view. Subsequently, it employs Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL) to find a weighted combination of the views which yields the best detection accuracy. Besides multi-view learning, MKLDroid's unique and salient trait is its ability to locate fine-grained malice code portions in dependency graphs (e.g., methods/classes). Through our large-scale experiments on several datasets (incl. wild apps), we demonstrate that MKLDroid outperforms three state-of-the-art techniques consistently, in terms of accuracy while maintaining comparable efficiency. In our malicious code localisation experiments on a dataset of repackaged malware, MKLDroid was able to identify all the malice classes with 94% average recall.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.
8 papers.
- 2021A Survey on Machine Learning Techniques for Source Code Analysiscited by 23
- 2021DexRay: A Simple, yet Effective Deep Learning Approach to Android Malware Detection based on Image Representation of Bytecodecited by 9
- 2022DexBERT: Effective, Task-Agnostic and Fine-grained Representation Learning of Android Bytecodecited by 6
- 2024A Survey of Source Code Representations for Machine Learning-Based Cybersecurity Taskscited by 4
- 2021A framework for comprehensible multi-modal detection of cyber threatscited by 0
- 2022Multi-view Representation Learning from Malware to Defend Against Adversarial Variantscited by 0
- 2022From Malware Samples to Fractal Images: A New Paradigm for Classification. (Version 2.0, Previous version paper name: Have you ever seen malware?)cited by 0
- 2024Leveraging LSTM and GAN for Modern Malware Detectioncited by 0
- 2024Leveraging LSTM and GAN for Modern Malware Detection7 May 2024
- 2024A Survey of Source Code Representations for Machine Learning-Based Cybersecurity Tasks15 Mar 2024
- 2022DexBERT: Effective, Task-Agnostic and Fine-grained Representation Learning of Android Bytecode12 Dec 2022
- 2022From Malware Samples to Fractal Images: A New Paradigm for Classification. (Version 2.0, Previous version paper name: Have you ever seen malware?)5 Dec 2022
- 2022Multi-view Representation Learning from Malware to Defend Against Adversarial Variants25 Oct 2022
- 2021A framework for comprehensible multi-modal detection of cyber threats10 Nov 2021
- 2021A Survey on Machine Learning Techniques for Source Code Analysis18 Oct 2021
- 2021DexRay: A Simple, yet Effective Deep Learning Approach to Android Malware Detection based on Image Representation of Bytecode5 Sep 2021