mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Testing for arbitrary interference on experimentation platforms

arXiv 1704.01190 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2017stat.MEcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Experimentation platforms are essential to modern large technology companies, as they are used to carry out many randomized experiments daily. The classic assumption of no interference among users, under which the outcome of one user does not depend on the treatment assigned to other users, is rarely tenable on such platforms. Here, we introduce an experimental design strategy for testing whether this assumption holds. Our approach is in the spirit of the Durbin-Wu-Hausman test for endogeneity in econometrics, where multiple estimators return the same estimate if and only if the null hypothesis holds. The design that we introduce makes no assumptions on the interference model between units, nor on the network among the units, and has a sharp bound on the variance and an implied analytical bound on the type I error rate. We discuss how to apply the proposed design strategy to large experimentation platforms, and we illustrate it in the context of an experiment on the LinkedIn platform.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 4.

8 papers.