Speaking the Same Language: Matching Machine to Human Captions by Adversarial Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While strong progress has been made in image captioning over the last years, machine and human captions are still quite distinct. A closer look reveals that this is due to the deficiencies in the generated word distribution, vocabulary size, and strong bias in the generators towards frequent captions. Furthermore, humans -- rightfully so -- generate multiple, diverse captions, due to the inherent ambiguity in the captioning task which is not considered in today's systems. To address these challenges, we change the training objective of the caption generator from reproducing groundtruth captions to generating a set of captions that is indistinguishable from human generated captions. Instead of handcrafting such a learning target, we employ adversarial training in combination with an approximate Gumbel sampler to implicitly match the generated distribution to the human one. While our method achieves comparable performance to the state-of-the-art in terms of the correctness of the captions, we generate a set of diverse captions, that are significantly less biased and match the word statistics better in several aspects.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
6 papers.
- 2021Let there be a clock on the beach: Reducing Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 76
- 2021Goal-driven text descriptions for imagescited by 1
- 2024Surveying the Landscape of Image Captioning Evaluation: A Comprehensive Taxonomy, Trends and Metrics Analysiscited by 1
- 2025Group-based Distinctive Image Captioning with Memory Difference Encoding and Attentioncited by 0
- 2025Evaluating Robustness of Vision-Language Models Under Noisy Conditionscited by 0
- 2025Surprisal reveals diversity gaps in image captioning and different scorers change the storycited by 0
- 2025Surprisal reveals diversity gaps in image captioning and different scorers change the story6 Nov 2025
- 2025Evaluating Robustness of Vision-Language Models Under Noisy Conditions15 Sep 2025
- 2025Group-based Distinctive Image Captioning with Memory Difference Encoding and Attention3 Apr 2025
- 2024Surveying the Landscape of Image Captioning Evaluation: A Comprehensive Taxonomy, Trends and Metrics Analysis9 Aug 2024
- 2021Let there be a clock on the beach: Reducing Object Hallucination in Image Captioning4 Oct 2021
- 2021Goal-driven text descriptions for images28 Aug 2021