mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Topological Analysis of Nerves, Reeb Spaces, Mappers, and Multiscale Mappers

arXiv 1703.07387 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2017cs.CG math.ATcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data analysis often concerns not only the space where data come from, but also various types of maps attached to data. In recent years, several related structures have been used to study maps on data, including Reeb spaces, mappers and multiscale mappers. The construction of these structures also relies on the so-called nerve of a cover of the domain. In this paper, we aim to analyze the topological information encoded in these structures in order to provide better understanding of these structures and facilitate their practical usage. More specifically, we show that the one-dimensional homology of the nerve complex N(U) of a path-connected cover U of a domain X cannot be richer than that of the domain X itself. Intuitively, this result means that no new H1-homology class can be "created" under a natural map from X to the nerve complex N(U). Equipping X with a pseudometric d, we further refine this result and characterize the classes of H1(X) that may survive in the nerve complex using the notion of size of the covering elements in U. These fundamental results about nerve complexes then lead to an analysis of the H1-homology of Reeb spaces, mappers and multiscale mappers. The analysis of H1-homology groups unfortunately does not extend to higher dimensions. Nevertheless, by using a map-induced metric, establishing a Gromov-Hausdorff convergence result between mappers and the domain, and interleaving relevant modules, we can still analyze the persistent homology groups of (multiscale) mappers to establish a connection to Reeb spaces.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.