mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evolving Parsimonious Networks by Mixing Activation Functions

arXiv 1703.07122 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2017cs.NEcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neuroevolution methods evolve the weights of a neural network, and in some cases the topology, but little work has been done to analyze the effect of evolving the activation functions of individual nodes on network size, which is important when training networks with a small number of samples. In this work we extend the neuroevolution algorithm NEAT to evolve the activation function of neurons in addition to the topology and weights of the network. The size and performance of networks produced using NEAT with uniform activation in all nodes, or homogenous networks, is compared to networks which contain a mixture of activation functions, or heterogenous networks. For a number of regression and classification benchmarks it is shown that, (1) qualitatively different activation functions lead to different results in homogeneous networks, (2) the heterogeneous version of NEAT is able to select well performing activation functions, (3) producing heterogeneous networks that are significantly smaller than homogeneous networks.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

8 papers.