Sparse Depth Sensing for Resource-Constrained Robots
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the case in which a robot has to navigate in an unknown environment but does not have enough on-board power or payload to carry a traditional depth sensor (e.g., a 3D lidar) and thus can only acquire a few (point-wise) depth measurements. We address the following question: is it possible to reconstruct the geometry of an unknown environment using sparse and incomplete depth measurements? Reconstruction from incomplete data is not possible in general, but when the robot operates in man-made environments, the depth exhibits some regularity (e.g., many planar surfaces with only a few edges); we leverage this regularity to infer depth from a small number of measurements. Our first contribution is a formulation of the depth reconstruction problem that bridges robot perception with the compressive sensing literature in signal processing. The second contribution includes a set of formal results that ascertain the exactness and stability of the depth reconstruction in 2D and 3D problems, and completely characterize the geometry of the profiles that we can reconstruct. Our third contribution is a set of practical algorithms for depth reconstruction: our formulation directly translates into algorithms for depth estimation based on convex programming. In real-world problems, these convex programs are very large and general-purpose solvers are relatively slow. For this reason, we discuss ad-hoc solvers that enable fast depth reconstruction in real problems. The last contribution is an extensive experimental evaluation in 2D and 3D problems, including Monte Carlo runs on simulated instances and testing on multiple real datasets. Empirical results confirm that the proposed approach ensures accurate depth reconstruction, outperforms interpolation-based strategies, and performs well even when the assumption of structured environment is violated.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Deep Depth Completion from Extremely Sparse Data: A Surveycited by 33
- 2021Event Guided Depth Sensingcited by 14
- 2023EVI-SAM: Robust, Real-time, Tightly-coupled Event-Visual-Inertial State Estimation and 3D Dense Mappingcited by 9
- 2024CFPNet: Improving Lightweight ToF Depth Completion via Cross-zone Feature Propagationcited by 4
- 2021Adaptive Illumination based Depth Sensing using Deep Superpixel and Soft Sampling Approximationcited by 2
- 2023Sparse Depth-Guided Attention for Accurate Depth Completion: A Stereo-Assisted Monitored Distillation Approachcited by 0
- 2024CFPNet: Improving Lightweight ToF Depth Completion via Cross-zone Feature Propagation7 Nov 2024
- 2023EVI-SAM: Robust, Real-time, Tightly-coupled Event-Visual-Inertial State Estimation and 3D Dense Mapping19 Dec 2023
- 2023Sparse Depth-Guided Attention for Accurate Depth Completion: A Stereo-Assisted Monitored Distillation Approach28 Mar 2023
- 2022Deep Depth Completion from Extremely Sparse Data: A Survey11 May 2022
- 2021Event Guided Depth Sensing20 Oct 2021
- 2021Adaptive Illumination based Depth Sensing using Deep Superpixel and Soft Sampling Approximation23 Mar 2021