Learning to Predict Streaming Video QoE: Distortions, Rebuffering and Memory
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mobile streaming video data accounts for a large and increasing percentage of wireless network traffic. The available bandwidths of modern wireless networks are often unstable, leading to difficulties in delivering smooth, high-quality video. Streaming service providers such as Netflix and YouTube attempt to adapt their systems to adjust in response to these bandwidth limitations by changing the video bitrate or, failing that, allowing playback interruptions (rebuffering). Being able to predict end user' quality of experience (QoE) resulting from these adjustments could lead to perceptually-driven network resource allocation strategies that would deliver streaming content of higher quality to clients, while being cost effective for providers. Existing objective QoE models only consider the effects on user QoE of video quality changes or playback interruptions. For streaming applications, adaptive network strategies may involve a combination of dynamic bitrate allocation along with playback interruptions when the available bandwidth reaches a very low value. Towards effectively predicting user QoE, we propose Video Assessment of TemporaL Artifacts and Stalls (Video ATLAS): a machine learning framework where we combine a number of QoE-related features, including objective quality features, rebuffering-aware features and memory-driven features to make QoE predictions. We evaluated our learning-based QoE prediction model on the recently designed LIVE-Netflix Video QoE Database which consists of practical playout patterns, where the videos are afflicted by both quality changes and rebuffering events, and found that it provides improved performance over state-of-the-art video quality metrics while generalizing well on different datasets. The proposed algorithm is made publicly available at http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/Quality/VideoATLAS release_v2.rar.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022A Brief Survey on Adaptive Video Streaming Quality Assessmentcited by 3
- 2023LSTM-based Video Quality Prediction Accounting for Temporal Distortions in Videoconferencing Callscited by 2
- 2024Subjective and Objective Quality-of-Experience Evaluation Study for Live Video Streamingcited by 1
- 2026SIA: Symbolic Interpretability for Anticipatory Deep Reinforcement Learning in Network Controlcited by 1
- 2024Satellite Streaming Video QoE Prediction: A Real-World Subjective Database and Network-Level Prediction Modelscited by 0
- 2025Generative QoE Modeling: A Lightweight Approach for Telecom Networkscited by 0
- 2026SIA: Symbolic Interpretability for Anticipatory Deep Reinforcement Learning in Network Control29 Jan 2026
- 2025Generative QoE Modeling: A Lightweight Approach for Telecom Networks30 Apr 2025
- 2024Satellite Streaming Video QoE Prediction: A Real-World Subjective Database and Network-Level Prediction Models17 Oct 2024
- 2024Subjective and Objective Quality-of-Experience Evaluation Study for Live Video Streaming26 Sep 2024
- 2023LSTM-based Video Quality Prediction Accounting for Temporal Distortions in Videoconferencing Calls22 Mar 2023
- 2022A Brief Survey on Adaptive Video Streaming Quality Assessment25 Feb 2022