mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Preference-based Teaching

arXiv 1702.02047 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2017cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a new model of teaching named "preference-based teaching" and a corresponding complexity parameter---the preference-based teaching dimension (PBTD)---representing the worst-case number of examples needed to teach any concept in a given concept class. Although the PBTD coincides with the well-known recursive teaching dimension (RTD) on finite classes, it is radically different on infinite ones: the RTD becomes infinite already for trivial infinite classes (such as half-intervals) whereas the PBTD evaluates to reasonably small values for a wide collection of infinite classes including classes consisting of so-called closed sets w.r.t. a given closure operator, including various classes related to linear sets over mathbbN0 (whose RTD had been studied quite recently) and including the class of Euclidean half-spaces. On top of presenting these concrete results, we provide the reader with a theoretical framework (of a combinatorial flavor) which helps to derive bounds on the PBTD.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2018: 1; 2019: 0; 2020: 0; 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

11 papers.