Learning from Label Proportions in Brain-Computer Interfaces: Online Unsupervised Learning with Guarantees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Objective: Using traditional approaches, a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) requires the collection of calibration data for new subjects prior to online use. Calibration time can be reduced or eliminated e.g.~by transfer of a pre-trained classifier or unsupervised adaptive classification methods which learn from scratch and adapt over time. While such heuristics work well in practice, none of them can provide theoretical guarantees. Our objective is to modify an event-related potential (ERP) paradigm to work in unison with the machine learning decoder to achieve a reliable calibration-less decoding with a guarantee to recover the true class means. Method: We introduce learning from label proportions (LLP) to the BCI community as a new unsupervised, and easy-to-implement classification approach for ERP-based BCIs. The LLP estimates the mean target and non-target responses based on known proportions of these two classes in different groups of the data. We modified a visual ERP speller to meet the requirements of the LLP. For evaluation, we ran simulations on artificially created data sets and conducted an online BCI study with N=13 subjects performing a copy-spelling task. Results: Theoretical considerations show that LLP is guaranteed to minimize the loss function similarly to a corresponding supervised classifier. It performed well in simulations and in the online application, where 84.5% of characters were spelled correctly on average without prior calibration. Significance: The continuously adapting LLP classifier is the first unsupervised decoder for ERP BCIs guaranteed to find the true class means. This makes it an ideal solution to avoid a tedious calibration and to tackle non-stationarities in the data. Additionally, LLP works on complementary principles compared to existing unsupervised methods, allowing for their further enhancement when combined with LLP.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2024The largest EEG-based BCI reproducibility study for open science: the MOABB benchmarkcited by 28
- 2026NeuralBench: A Unifying Framework to Benchmark NeuroAI Modelscited by 13
- 2022Introducing Block-Toeplitz Covariance Matrices to Remaster Linear Discriminant Analysis for Event-related Potential Brain-computer Interfacescited by 4
- 2023UMM: Unsupervised Mean-difference Maximizationcited by 4
- 2025Self-Calibrating BCIs: Ranking and Recovery of Mental Targets Without Labelscited by 1
- 2022IFTT-PIN: Demonstrating the Self-Calibration Paradigm on a PIN-Entry Taskcited by 0
- 2022IFTT-PIN: A PIN-Entry Method Leveraging the Self-Calibration Paradigmcited by 0
- 2025EDAPT: Towards Calibration-Free BCIs with Continual Online Adaptationcited by 0
- 2026CortexBridge: Cortical Alignment of EEG Montages for Foundation Modelscited by 0
- 2026CortexBridge: Cortical Alignment of EEG Montages for Foundation Models1 Oct 2026
- 2026NeuralBench: A Unifying Framework to Benchmark NeuroAI Models8 May 2026
- 2025EDAPT: Towards Calibration-Free BCIs with Continual Online Adaptation14 Aug 2025
- 2025Self-Calibrating BCIs: Ranking and Recovery of Mental Targets Without Labels11 Jun 2025
- 2024The largest EEG-based BCI reproducibility study for open science: the MOABB benchmark3 Apr 2024
- 2023UMM: Unsupervised Mean-difference Maximization20 Jun 2023
- 2022IFTT-PIN: A PIN-Entry Method Leveraging the Self-Calibration Paradigm19 May 2022
- 2022IFTT-PIN: Demonstrating the Self-Calibration Paradigm on a PIN-Entry Task5 Apr 2022
- 2022Introducing Block-Toeplitz Covariance Matrices to Remaster Linear Discriminant Analysis for Event-related Potential Brain-computer Interfaces4 Feb 2022