Bayesian System Identification based on Hierarchical Sparse Bayesian Learning and Gibbs Sampling with Application to Structural Damage Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The focus in this paper is Bayesian system identification based on noisy incomplete modal data where we can impose spatially-sparse stiffness changes when updating a structural model. To this end, based on a similar hierarchical sparse Bayesian learning model from our previous work, we propose two Gibbs sampling algorithms. The algorithms differ in their strategies to deal with the posterior uncertainty of the equation-error precision parameter, but both sample from the conditional posterior probability density functions (PDFs) for the structural stiffness parameters and system modal parameters. The effective dimension for the Gibbs sampling is low because iterative sampling is done from only three conditional posterior PDFs that correspond to three parameter groups, along with sampling of the equation-error precision parameter from another conditional posterior PDF in one of the algorithms where it is not integrated out as a "nuisance" parameter. A nice feature from a computational perspective is that it is not necessary to solve a nonlinear eigenvalue problem of a structural model. The effectiveness and robustness of the proposed algorithms are illustrated by applying them to the IASE-ASCE Phase II simulated and experimental benchmark studies. The goal is to use incomplete modal data identified before and after possible damage to detect and assess spatially-sparse stiffness reductions induced by any damage. Our past and current focus on meeting challenges arising from Bayesian inference of structural stiffness serve to strengthen the capability of vibration-based structural system identification but our methods also have much broader applicability for inverse problems in science and technology where system matrices are to be inferred from noisy partial information about their eigenquantities.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025A generative adversarial network optimization method for damage detection and digital twinning by deep AI fault learning: Z24 Bridge structural health monitoring benchmark validationcited by 1
- 2024A new perspective on Bayesian Operational Modal Analysiscited by 0
- 2026MCMC with Adaptive Principal-Component Transformation: Rotation-Invariant Universal Samplers for Bayesian Structural System Identificationcited by 0
- 2026Probabilistic Graphical Model using Graph Neural Networks for Bayesian Inversion of Discrete Structural Component Statescited by 0
- 2026Probabilistic data quality assessment for structural monitoring data via outlier-resistant conditional diffusion modelcited by 0
- 2026Probabilistic data quality assessment for structural monitoring data via outlier-resistant conditional diffusion model29 Apr 2026
- 2026Probabilistic Graphical Model using Graph Neural Networks for Bayesian Inversion of Discrete Structural Component States26 Apr 2026
- 2026MCMC with Adaptive Principal-Component Transformation: Rotation-Invariant Universal Samplers for Bayesian Structural System Identification25 Apr 2026
- 2025A generative adversarial network optimization method for damage detection and digital twinning by deep AI fault learning: Z24 Bridge structural health monitoring benchmark validation30 Oct 2025
- 2024A new perspective on Bayesian Operational Modal Analysis16 Aug 2024