Task-Specific Attentive Pooling of Phrase Alignments Contributes to Sentence Matching
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work studies comparatively two typical sentence matching tasks: textual entailment (TE) and answer selection (AS), observing that weaker phrase alignments are more critical in TE, while stronger phrase alignments deserve more attention in AS. The key to reach this observation lies in phrase detection, phrase representation, phrase alignment, and more importantly how to connect those aligned phrases of different matching degrees with the final classifier. Prior work (i) has limitations in phrase generation and representation, or (ii) conducts alignment at word and phrase levels by handcrafted features or (iii) utilizes a single framework of alignment without considering the characteristics of specific tasks, which limits the framework's effectiveness across tasks. We propose an architecture based on Gated Recurrent Unit that supports (i) representation learning of phrases of arbitrary granularity and (ii) task-specific attentive pooling of phrase alignments between two sentences. Experimental results on TE and AS match our observation and show the effectiveness of our approach.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.
1 paper.