mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

To Boost or Not to Boost? On the Limits of Boosted Trees for Object Detection

arXiv 1701.01692 ↗First posted 6 Jan 2017cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We aim to study the modeling limitations of the commonly employed boosted decision trees classifier. Inspired by the success of large, data-hungry visual recognition models (e.g. deep convolutional neural networks), this paper focuses on the relationship between modeling capacity of the weak learners, dataset size, and dataset properties. A set of novel experiments on the Caltech Pedestrian Detection benchmark results in the best known performance among non-CNN techniques while operating at fast run-time speed. Furthermore, the performance is on par with deep architectures (9.71% log-average miss rate), while using only HOG+LUV channels as features. The conclusions from this study are shown to generalize over different object detection domains as demonstrated on the FDDB face detection benchmark (93.37% accuracy). Despite the impressive performance, this study reveals the limited modeling capacity of the common boosted trees model, motivating a need for architectural changes in order to compete with multi-level and very deep architectures.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4.

4 papers.