Toward sensitive document release with privacy guarantees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Privacy has become a serious concern for modern Information Societies. The sensitive nature of much of the data that are daily exchanged or released to untrusted parties requires that responsible organizations undertake appropriate privacy protection measures. Nowadays, much of these data are texts (e.g., emails, messages posted in social media, healthcare outcomes, etc.) that, because of their unstructured and semantic nature, constitute a challenge for automatic data protection methods. In fact, textual documents are usually protected manually, in a process known as document redaction or sanitization. To do so, human experts identify sensitive terms (i.e., terms that may reveal identities and/or confidential information) and protect them accordingly (e.g., via removal or, preferably, generalization). To relieve experts from this burdensome task, in a previous work we introduced the theoretical basis of C-sanitization, an inherently semantic privacy model that provides the basis to the development of automatic document redaction/sanitization algorithms and offers clear and a priori privacy guarantees on data protection; even though its potential benefits C-sanitization still presents some limitations when applied to practice (mainly regarding flexibility, efficiency and accuracy). In this paper, we propose a new more flexible model, named (C, g(C))-sanitization, which enables an intuitive configuration of the trade-off between the desired level of protection (i.e., controlled information disclosure) and the preservation of the utility of the protected data (i.e., amount of semantics to be preserved). Moreover, we also present a set of technical solutions and algorithms that provide an efficient and scalable implementation of the model and improve its practical accuracy, as we also illustrate through empirical experiments.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2022The Text Anonymization Benchmark (TAB): A Dedicated Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Text Anonymizationcited by 94
- 2024Digital Forgetting in Large Language Models: A Survey of Unlearning Methodscited by 38
- 2024Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2024Cloaked Classifiers: Pseudonymization Strategies on Sensitive Classification Taskscited by 3
- 2026Say Something Else: Rethinking Contextual Privacy as Information Sufficiencycited by 0
- 2026PrivBench: A Holistic and Modular Benchmarking Platform for Evaluating Text-to-Text Privatizationcited by 0
- 2026PrivBench: A Holistic and Modular Benchmarking Platform for Evaluating Text-to-Text Privatization30 Aug 2026
- 2026Say Something Else: Rethinking Contextual Privacy as Information Sufficiency7 Apr 2026
- 2024Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Models16 Jul 2024
- 2024Cloaked Classifiers: Pseudonymization Strategies on Sensitive Classification Tasks25 Jun 2024
- 2024Digital Forgetting in Large Language Models: A Survey of Unlearning Methods2 Apr 2024
- 2022The Text Anonymization Benchmark (TAB): A Dedicated Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Text Anonymization25 Jan 2022