Lazily Adapted Constant Kinky Inference for Nonparametric Regression and Model-Reference Adaptive Control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Techniques known as Nonlinear Set Membership prediction, Lipschitz Interpolation or Kinky Inference are approaches to machine learning that utilise presupposed Lipschitz properties to compute inferences over unobserved function values. Provided a bound on the true best Lipschitz constant of the target function is known a priori they offer convergence guarantees as well as bounds around the predictions. Considering a more general setting that builds on Hoelder continuity relative to pseudo-metrics, we propose an online method for estimating the Hoelder constant online from function value observations that possibly are corrupted by bounded observational errors. Utilising this to compute adaptive parameters within a kinky inference rule gives rise to a nonparametric machine learning method, for which we establish strong universal approximation guarantees. That is, we show that our prediction rule can learn any continuous function in the limit of increasingly dense data to within a worst-case error bound that depends on the level of observational uncertainty. We apply our method in the context of nonparametric model-reference adaptive control (MRAC). Across a range of simulated aircraft roll-dynamics and performance metrics our approach outperforms recently proposed alternatives that were based on Gaussian processes and RBF-neural networks. For discrete-time systems, we provide guarantees on the tracking success of our learning-based controllers both for the batch and the online learning setting.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024On Safety in Safe Bayesian Optimizationcited by 15
- 2024PACSBO: Probably approximately correct safe Bayesian optimizationcited by 8
- 2024Transfer of Safety Controllers Through Learning Deep Inverse Dynamics Modelcited by 1
- 2026Computationally lightweight classifiers with frequentist bounds on predictionscited by 1
- 2024Transfer Learning for Control Systems via Neural Simulation Relationscited by 0
- 2026Computationally lightweight classifiers with frequentist bounds on predictions23 Mar 2026
- 2024Transfer Learning for Control Systems via Neural Simulation Relations2 Dec 2024
- 2024PACSBO: Probably approximately correct safe Bayesian optimization2 Sep 2024
- 2024Transfer of Safety Controllers Through Learning Deep Inverse Dynamics Model22 May 2024
- 2024On Safety in Safe Bayesian Optimization19 Mar 2024