Finding Better Active Learners for Faster Literature Reviews
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Literature reviews can be time-consuming and tedious to complete. By cataloging and refactoring three state-of-the-art active learning techniques from evidence-based medicine and legal electronic discovery, this paper finds and implements FASTREAD, a faster technique for studying a large corpus of documents. This paper assesses FASTREAD using datasets generated from existing SE literature reviews (Hall, Wahono, Radjenovi'c, Kitchenham et al.). Compared to manual methods, FASTREAD lets researchers find 95% relevant studies after reviewing an order of magnitude fewer papers. Compared to other state-of-the-art automatic methods, FASTREAD reviews 20-50% fewer studies while finding same number of relevant primary studies in a systematic literature review.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Artificial Intelligence for Literature Reviews: Opportunities and Challengescited by 30
- 2024Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literaturecited by 11
- 2022DebtFree: Minimizing Labeling Cost in Self-Admitted Technical Debt Identification using Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 5
- 2021Robust Active Learning: Sample-Efficient Training of Robust Deep Learning Modelscited by 2
- 2024Artificial Intelligence for Literature Reviews: Opportunities and Challenges13 Feb 2024
- 2024Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature13 Jan 2024
- 2022DebtFree: Minimizing Labeling Cost in Self-Admitted Technical Debt Identification using Semi-Supervised Learning25 Jan 2022
- 2021Robust Active Learning: Sample-Efficient Training of Robust Deep Learning Models5 Dec 2021