mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sampling Random Spanning Trees Faster than Matrix Multiplication

arXiv 1611.07451 ↗First posted 22 Nov 2016cs.DScited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present an algorithm that, with high probability, generates a random spanning tree from an edge-weighted undirected graph in tildeO(n4/3m1/2+n2) time (The tildeO(·) notation hides operatornamepolylog(n) factors). The tree is sampled from a distribution where the probability of each tree is proportional to the product of its edge weights. This improves upon the previous best algorithm due to Colbourn et al. that runs in matrix multiplication time, O(nω). For the special case of unweighted graphs, this improves upon the best previously known running time of tildeO(minnω,m√n,m4/3) for m gg n5/3 (Colbourn et al. '96, Kelner-Madry '09, Madry et al. '15). The effective resistance metric is essential to our algorithm, as in the work of Madry et al., but we eschew determinant-based and random walk-based techniques used by previous algorithms. Instead, our algorithm is based on Gaussian elimination, and the fact that effective resistance is preserved in the graph resulting from eliminating a subset of vertices (called a Schur complement). As part of our algorithm, we show how to compute ε-approximate effective resistances for a set S of vertex pairs via approximate Schur complements in tildeO(m+(n + |S|)ε-2) time, without using the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma which requires tildeO( min(m + |S|)ε-2, m+nε-4 +|S|ε-2) time. We combine this approximation procedure with an error correction procedure for handing edges where our estimate isn't sufficiently accurate.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

7 papers.