Explicablility as Minimizing Distance from Expected Behavior
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In order to have effective human-AI collaboration, it is necessary to address how the AI agent's behavior is being perceived by the humans-in-the-loop. When the agent's task plans are generated without such considerations, they may often demonstrate inexplicable behavior from the human's point of view. This problem may arise due to the human's partial or inaccurate understanding of the agent's planning model. This may have serious implications from increased cognitive load to more serious concerns of safety around a physical agent. In this paper, we address this issue by modeling plan explicability as a function of the distance between a plan that agent makes and the plan that human expects it to make. We learn a regression model for mapping the plan distances to explicability scores of plans and develop an anytime search algorithm that can use this model as a heuristic to come up with progressively explicable plans. We evaluate the effectiveness of our approach in a simulated autonomous car domain and a physical robot domain.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2021Generating Active Explicable Plans in Human-Robot Teamingcited by 2
- 2023Safe Explicable Planningcited by 1
- 2025Safe Explicable Policy Searchcited by 0
- 2025Safe Explicable Policy Search10 Mar 2025
- 2023Safe Explicable Planning4 Apr 2023
- 2021Generating Active Explicable Plans in Human-Robot Teaming18 Sep 2021