mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Continuity Assumptions in Cake-Cutting

arXiv 1611.04988 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2016cs.DScited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In important papers on cake-cutting -- one of the key areas in fair division and resource allocation -- the measure-theoretical fundamentals are not fully correctly given. It is not clear (i) which family of sets should be taken for the pieces of cake, (ii) which set-functions should be used for evaluating the pieces, and (iii) which is the relationship between various continuity properties appearing in cake-cutting. We show that probably the best choice for the familiy of subsets of [0,1] is the Borel σ-algebra and for the set-function any `sliceable' Borel measure. At least in dimension one it does not make sense to work with only finitely additive contents on finite unions of intervals. For the continuity property we see two possibilities. The weaker is the traditional divisibility property, which is equivalent to being atom-free. The stronger is simply absolute continuity with respect to Lebesgue measure. We also consider the case of a base set (cake or pie) more general than [0,1].

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.