mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

One Class Splitting Criteria for Random Forests

arXiv 1611.01971 ↗First posted 7 Nov 2016stat.ML cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Random Forests (RFs) are strong machine learning tools for classification and regression. However, they remain supervised algorithms, and no extension of RFs to the one-class setting has been proposed, except for techniques based on second-class sampling. This work fills this gap by proposing a natural methodology to extend standard splitting criteria to the one-class setting, structurally generalizing RFs to one-class classification. An extensive benchmark of seven state-of-the-art anomaly detection algorithms is also presented. This empirically demonstrates the relevance of our approach.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1.

4 papers.