mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Auxiliary gradient-based sampling algorithms

arXiv 1610.09641 ↗First posted 30 Oct 2016stat.ML stat.COcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a new family of MCMC samplers that combine auxiliary variables, Gibbs sampling and Taylor expansions of the target density. Our approach permits the marginalisation over the auxiliary variables yielding marginal samplers, or the augmentation of the auxiliary variables, yielding auxiliary samplers. The well-known Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm (MALA) and preconditioned Crank-Nicolson Langevin (pCNL) algorithm are shown to be special cases. We prove that marginal samplers are superior in terms of asymptotic variance and demonstrate cases where they are slower in computing time compared to auxiliary samplers. In the context of latent Gaussian models we propose new auxiliary and marginal samplers whose implementation requires a single tuning parameter, which can be found automatically during the transient phase. Extensive experimentation shows that the increase in efficiency (measured as effective sample size per unit of computing time) relative to (optimised implementations of) pCNL, elliptical slice sampling and MALA ranges from 10-fold in binary classification problems to 25-fold in log-Gaussian Cox processes to 100-fold in Gaussian process regression, and it is on par with Riemann manifold Hamiltonian Monte Carlo in an example where the latter has the same complexity as the aforementioned algorithms. We explain this remarkable improvement in terms of the way alternative samplers try to approximate the eigenvalues of the target. We introduce a novel MCMC sampling scheme for hyperparameter learning that builds upon the auxiliary samplers. The MATLAB code for reproducing the experiments in the article is publicly available and a Supplement to this article contains additional experiments and implementation details.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023The probability flow ODE is provably fastcited by 145
  2. 2022Improved analysis for a proximal algorithm for samplingcited by 72
  3. 2023Faster high-accuracy log-concave sampling via algorithmic warm startscited by 44
  4. 2021Bayesian Imaging With Data-Driven Priors Encoded by Neural Networks: Theory, Methods, and Algorithmscited by 24
  5. 2024Diffusive Gibbs Samplingcited by 21
  6. 2024Conditional sampling within generative diffusion modelscited by 18
  7. 2023Optimal Preconditioning and Fisher Adaptive Langevin Samplingcited by 14
  8. 2025Mixing Time of the Proximal Sampler in Relative Fisher Information via Strong Data Processing Inequalitycited by 11
  9. 2022Enhanced gradient-based MCMC in discrete spacescited by 10
  10. 2023Mean-Square Analysis of Discretized Ito Diffusions for Heavy-tailed Samplingcited by 4
  11. 2023Non-Log-Concave and Nonsmooth Sampling via Langevin Monte Carlo Algorithmscited by 4
  12. 2025Beyond Scores: Proximal Diffusion Modelscited by 3
9 more
  1. 2025Operator-Level Quantum Acceleration of Non-Logconcave Samplingcited by 1
  2. 2025Gaussian Invariant Markov Chain Monte Carlocited by 1
  3. 2026Fast-Mixing Markov Chains without Gradientscited by 1
  4. 2023Auxiliary MCMC and particle Gibbs samplers for parallelisable inference in latent dynamical systemscited by 0
  5. 2024Markov chain Monte Carlo without evaluating the target: an auxiliary variable approachcited by 0
  6. 2024Fast Gibbs sampling for the local and global trend Bayesian exponential smoothing modelcited by 0
  7. 2025Preconditioned Discrete-HAMS: A Second-order Irreversible Discrete Samplercited by 0
  8. 2026Local Geometric Mixing via Dobrushin Contraction with Applications to Diffusion Path Monte Carlo and the Proximal Samplercited by 0
  9. 2026On skew-symmetric distributions and their use in Monte Carlo sampling algorithms: coordinate-free, Gibbs-style and manifold versions of the Barker proposalcited by 0