mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Price of Transparency in Strategic Machine Learning

arXiv 1610.08210 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2016cs.GTcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Based on the observation that the transparency of an algorithm comes with a cost for the algorithm designer when the users (data providers) are strategic, this paper studies the impact of strategic intent of the users on the design and performance of transparent ML algorithms. We quantitatively study the bf price of transparency in the context of strategic classification algorithms, by modeling the problem as a nonzero-sum game between the users and the algorithm designer. The cost of having a transparent algorithm is measured by a quantity, named here as price of transparency which is the ratio of the designer cost at the Stackelberg equilibrium, when the algorithm is transparent (which allows users to be strategic) to that of the setting where the algorithm is not transparent.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.

6 papers.