Attention and Anticipation in Fast Visual-Inertial Navigation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study a Visual-Inertial Navigation (VIN) problem in which a robot needs to estimate its state using an on-board camera and an inertial sensor, without any prior knowledge of the external environment. We consider the case in which the robot can allocate limited resources to VIN, due to tight computational constraints. Therefore, we answer the following question: under limited resources, what are the most relevant visual cues to maximize the performance of visual-inertial navigation? Our approach has four key ingredients. First, it is task-driven, in that the selection of the visual cues is guided by a metric quantifying the VIN performance. Second, it exploits the notion of anticipation, since it uses a simplified model for forward-simulation of robot dynamics, predicting the utility of a set of visual cues over a future time horizon. Third, it is efficient and easy to implement, since it leads to a greedy algorithm for the selection of the most relevant visual cues. Fourth, it provides formal performance guarantees: we leverage submodularity to prove that the greedy selection cannot be far from the optimal (combinatorial) selection. Simulations and real experiments on agile drones show that our approach ensures state-of-the-art VIN performance while maintaining a lean processing time. In the easy scenarios, our approach outperforms appearance-based feature selection in terms of localization errors. In the most challenging scenarios, it enables accurate visual-inertial navigation while appearance-based feature selection fails to track robot's motion during aggressive maneuvers.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2021Beyond Robustness: A Taxonomy of Approaches towards Resilient Multi-Robot Systemscited by 12
- 2021Greedy-Based Feature Selection for Efficient LiDAR SLAMcited by 9
- 2021Balancing the Budget: Feature Selection and Tracking for Multi-Camera Visual-Inertial Odometrycited by 6
- 2021Robust GPS-Vision Localization via Integrity-Driven Landmark Attentioncited by 2
- 2023ShadowNav: Crater-Based Localization for Nighttime and Permanently Shadowed Region Lunar Navigationcited by 1
- 2025User-Centric Communication Service Provision for Edge-Assisted Mobile Augmented Realitycited by 1
- 2025Practical and Performant Enhancements for Maximization of Algebraic Connectivitycited by 0
- 2026The Geometric Observability Index: Influence, Fisher Information, and Weak Observability in SE(3) Pose Estimationcited by 0
- 2026The Geometric Observability Index: Influence, Fisher Information, and Weak Observability in SE(3) Pose Estimation5 Feb 2026
- 2025Practical and Performant Enhancements for Maximization of Algebraic Connectivity11 Nov 2025
- 2025User-Centric Communication Service Provision for Edge-Assisted Mobile Augmented Reality30 Sep 2025
- 2023ShadowNav: Crater-Based Localization for Nighttime and Permanently Shadowed Region Lunar Navigation11 Jan 2023
- 2021Beyond Robustness: A Taxonomy of Approaches towards Resilient Multi-Robot Systems25 Sep 2021
- 2021Balancing the Budget: Feature Selection and Tracking for Multi-Camera Visual-Inertial Odometry13 Sep 2021
- 2021Greedy-Based Feature Selection for Efficient LiDAR SLAM24 Mar 2021
- 2021Robust GPS-Vision Localization via Integrity-Driven Landmark Attention13 Jan 2021