Funneled Bayesian Optimization for Design, Tuning and Control of Autonomous Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian optimization has become a fundamental global optimization algorithm in many problems where sample efficiency is of paramount importance. Recently, there has been proposed a large number of new applications in fields such as robotics, machine learning, experimental design, simulation, etc. In this paper, we focus on several problems that appear in robotics and autonomous systems: algorithm tuning, automatic control and intelligent design. All those problems can be mapped to global optimization problems. However, they become hard optimization problems. Bayesian optimization internally uses a probabilistic surrogate model (e.g.: Gaussian process) to learn from the process and reduce the number of samples required. In order to generalize to unknown functions in a black-box fashion, the common assumption is that the underlying function can be modeled with a stationary process. Nonstationary Gaussian process regression cannot generalize easily and it typically requires prior knowledge of the function. Some works have designed techniques to generalize Bayesian optimization to nonstationary functions in an indirect way, but using techniques originally designed for regression, where the objective is to improve the quality of the surrogate model everywhere. Instead optimization should focus on improving the surrogate model near the optimum. In this paper, we present a novel kernel function specially designed for Bayesian optimization, that allows nonstationary behavior of the surrogate model in an adaptive local region. In our experiments, we found that this new kernel results in an improved local search (exploitation), without penalizing the global search (exploration). We provide results in well-known benchmarks and real applications. The new method outperforms the state of the art in Bayesian optimization both in stationary and nonstationary problems.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021HPOBench: A Collection of Reproducible Multi-Fidelity Benchmark Problems for HPOcited by 111
- 2021A Robust Asymmetric Kernel Function for Bayesian Optimization, with Application to Image Defect Detection in Manufacturing Systemscited by 6
- 2023LABCAT: Locally adaptive Bayesian optimization using principal-component-aligned trust regionscited by 2
- 2024Augmented Bayesian Policy Searchcited by 2
- 2025Co-Learning Bayesian Optimizationcited by 2
- 2024A Trajectory-Based Bayesian Approach to Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization with Epoch-Aware Trade-Offscited by 1
- 2025Optimal Parameter Adaptation for Safety-Critical Control via Safe Barrier Bayesian Optimizationcited by 0
- 2025Direct Regret Optimization in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Frontier LLMs are effective batch optimizers: Assessing reasoning models in continuous and discrete settingscited by 0
- 2026Frontier LLMs are effective batch optimizers: Assessing reasoning models in continuous and discrete settings2 Sep 2026
- 2025Direct Regret Optimization in Bayesian Optimization9 Jul 2025
- 2025Optimal Parameter Adaptation for Safety-Critical Control via Safe Barrier Bayesian Optimization25 Mar 2025
- 2025Co-Learning Bayesian Optimization23 Jan 2025
- 2024Augmented Bayesian Policy Search5 Jul 2024
- 2024A Trajectory-Based Bayesian Approach to Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization with Epoch-Aware Trade-Offs24 May 2024
- 2023LABCAT: Locally adaptive Bayesian optimization using principal-component-aligned trust regions19 Nov 2023
- 2021A Robust Asymmetric Kernel Function for Bayesian Optimization, with Application to Image Defect Detection in Manufacturing Systems22 Sep 2021
- 2021HPOBench: A Collection of Reproducible Multi-Fidelity Benchmark Problems for HPO14 Sep 2021