Convex Program Duality, Fisher Markets, and Nash Social Welfare
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study Fisher markets and the problem of maximizing the Nash social welfare (NSW), and show several closely related new results. In particular, we obtain: -- A new integer program for the NSW maximization problem whose fractional relaxation has a bounded integrality gap. In contrast, the natural integer program has an unbounded integrality gap. -- An improved, and tight, factor 2 analysis of the algorithm of [7]; in turn showing that the integrality gap of the above relaxation is at most 2. The approximation factor shown by [7] was 2e1/e ≈ 2.89. -- A lower bound of e1/e≈ 1.44 on the integrality gap of this relaxation. -- New convex programs for natural generalizations of linear Fisher markets and proofs that these markets admit rational equilibria. These results were obtained by establishing connections between previously known disparate results, and they help uncover their mathematical underpinnings. We show a formal connection between the convex programs of Eisenberg and Gale and that of Shmyrev, namely that their duals are equivalent up to a change of variables. Both programs capture equilibria of linear Fisher markets. By adding suitable constraints to Shmyrev's program, we obtain a convex program that captures equilibria of the spending-restricted market model defined by [7] in the context of the NSW maximization problem. Further, adding certain integral constraints to this program we get the integer program for the NSW mentioned above. The basic tool we use is convex programming duality. In the special case of convex programs with linear constraints (but convex objectives), we show a particularly simple way of obtaining dual programs, putting it almost at par with linear program duality. This simple way of finding duals has been used subsequently for many other applications.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2022Stochastic Online Fisher Markets: Static Pricing Limits and Adaptive Enhancementscited by 2
- 2026Price of Fairness in Bandits: A Tight Minimax Characterizationcited by 1
- 2024Large-Scale Contextual Market Equilibrium Computation through Deep Learningcited by 0
- 2026Divide-and-Denoise: A Game-Theoretic Method for Fairly Composing Diffusion Modelscited by 0
- 2026Multi-Dimensional Matchingcited by 0
- 2026Multi-Dimensional Matching24 Sep 2026
- 2026Price of Fairness in Bandits: A Tight Minimax Characterization15 Jul 2026
- 2026Divide-and-Denoise: A Game-Theoretic Method for Fairly Composing Diffusion Models8 Jun 2026
- 2024Large-Scale Contextual Market Equilibrium Computation through Deep Learning11 Jun 2024
- 2022Stochastic Online Fisher Markets: Static Pricing Limits and Adaptive Enhancements27 Apr 2022