Generalized Kalman Smoothing: Modeling and Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
State-space smoothing has found many applications in science and engineering. Under linear and Gaussian assumptions, smoothed estimates can be obtained using efficient recursions, for example Rauch-Tung-Striebel and Mayne-Fraser algorithms. Such schemes are equivalent to linear algebraic techniques that minimize a convex quadratic objective function with structure induced by the dynamic model. These classical formulations fall short in many important circumstances. For instance, smoothers obtained using quadratic penalties can fail when outliers are present in the data, and cannot track impulsive inputs and abrupt state changes. Motivated by these shortcomings, generalized Kalman smoothing formulations have been proposed in the last few years, replacing quadratic models with more suitable, often nonsmooth, convex functions. In contrast to classical models, these general estimators require use of iterated algorithms, and these have received increased attention from control, signal processing, machine learning, and optimization communities. In this survey we show that the optimization viewpoint provides the control and signal processing community great freedom in the development of novel modeling and inference frameworks for dynamical systems. We discuss general statistical models for dynamic systems, making full use of nonsmooth convex penalties and constraints, and providing links to important models in signal processing and machine learning. We also survey optimization techniques for these formulations, paying close attention to dynamic problem structure. Modeling concepts and algorithms are illustrated with numerical examples.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021Deepfakes Generation and Detection: State-of-the-art, open challenges, countermeasures, and way forwardcited by 82
- 2025Deep FlexQP: Accelerated Nonlinear Programming via Deep Unfoldingcited by 4
- 2022Outlier-Insensitive Kalman Filtering Using NUV Priorscited by 1
- 2024Imputation Matters: A Deeper Look into an Overlooked Step in Longitudinal Health and Behavior Sensing Researchcited by 1
- 2021Training Structured Mechanical Models by Minimizing Discrete Euler-Lagrange Residualcited by 0
- 2023Multi-kernel Correntropy-based Orientation Estimation of IMUs: Gradient Descent Methodscited by 0
- 2023Outlier-Insensitive Kalman Filtering: Theory and Applicationscited by 0
- 2024Maximum likelihood inference for high-dimensional problems with multiaffine variable relationscited by 0
- 2025A joint optimization approach to identifying sparse dynamics using least squares kernel collocationcited by 0
- 2026Hierarchical Variational Kalman Filteringcited by 0
- 2026Hierarchical Variational Kalman Filtering1 Jul 2026
- 2025Deep FlexQP: Accelerated Nonlinear Programming via Deep Unfolding1 Dec 2025
- 2025A joint optimization approach to identifying sparse dynamics using least squares kernel collocation23 Nov 2025
- 2024Imputation Matters: A Deeper Look into an Overlooked Step in Longitudinal Health and Behavior Sensing Research8 Dec 2024
- 2024Maximum likelihood inference for high-dimensional problems with multiaffine variable relations5 Sep 2024
- 2023Outlier-Insensitive Kalman Filtering: Theory and Applications18 Sep 2023
- 2023Multi-kernel Correntropy-based Orientation Estimation of IMUs: Gradient Descent Methods13 Apr 2023
- 2022Outlier-Insensitive Kalman Filtering Using NUV Priors12 Oct 2022
- 2021Training Structured Mechanical Models by Minimizing Discrete Euler-Lagrange Residual5 May 2021
- 2021Deepfakes Generation and Detection: State-of-the-art, open challenges, countermeasures, and way forward25 Feb 2021