Graph-Based Active Learning: A New Look at Expected Error Minimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In graph-based active learning, algorithms based on expected error minimization (EEM) have been popular and yield good empirical performance. The exact computation of EEM optimally balances exploration and exploitation. In practice, however, EEM-based algorithms employ various approximations due to the computational hardness of exact EEM. This can result in a lack of either exploration or exploitation, which can negatively impact the effectiveness of active learning. We propose a new algorithm TSA (Two-Step Approximation) that balances between exploration and exploitation efficiently while enjoying the same computational complexity as existing approximations. Finally, we empirically show the value of balancing between exploration and exploitation in both toy and real-world datasets where our method outperforms several state-of-the-art methods.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024A Short Survey on Importance Weighting for Machine Learningcited by 15
- 2024Uncertainty for Active Learning on Graphscited by 11
- 2021Model-Change Active Learning in Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 8
- 2022Poisson Reweighted Laplacian Uncertainty Sampling for Graph-based Active Learningcited by 6
- 2024Uncertainty for Active Learning on Graphs2 May 2024
- 2024A Short Survey on Importance Weighting for Machine Learning15 Mar 2024
- 2022Poisson Reweighted Laplacian Uncertainty Sampling for Graph-based Active Learning27 Oct 2022
- 2021Model-Change Active Learning in Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Learning14 Oct 2021