Testing k-Monotonicity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A Boolean k-monotone function defined over a finite poset domain cal D alternates between the values 0 and 1 at most k times on any ascending chain in cal D. Therefore, k-monotone functions are natural generalizations of the classical monotone functions, which are the 1-monotone functions. Motivated by the recent interest in k-monotone functions in the context of circuit complexity and learning theory, and by the central role that monotonicity testing plays in the context of property testing, we initiate a systematic study of k-monotone functions, in the property testing model. In this model, the goal is to distinguish functions that are k-monotone (or are close to being k-monotone) from functions that are far from being k-monotone. Our results include the following: - We demonstrate a separation between testing k-monotonicity and testing monotonicity, on the hypercube domain 0,1d, for k≥ 3; - We demonstrate a separation between testing and learning on 0,1d, for k=ω(log d): testing k-monotonicity can be performed with 2^O(√ d · log d· log1/varepsilon) queries, while learning k-monotone functions requires 2^Omega(k· √ d·1/varepsilon) queries (Blais et al. (RANDOM 2015)). - We present a tolerant test for functions fcolon[n]d→ 0,1 with complexity independent of n, which makes progress on a problem left open by Berman et al. (STOC 2014). Our techniques exploit the testing-by-learning paradigm, use novel applications of Fourier analysis on the grid [n]d, and draw connections to distribution testing techniques.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
2 papers.