Learning to generalize to new compositions in image understanding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recurrent neural networks have recently been used for learning to describe images using natural language. However, it has been observed that these models generalize poorly to scenes that were not observed during training, possibly depending too strongly on the statistics of the text in the training data. Here we propose to describe images using short structured representations, aiming to capture the crux of a description. These structured representations allow us to tease-out and evaluate separately two types of generalization: standard generalization to new images with similar scenes, and generalization to new combinations of known entities. We compare two learning approaches on the MS-COCO dataset: a state-of-the-art recurrent network based on an LSTM (Show, Attend and Tell), and a simple structured prediction model on top of a deep network. We find that the structured model generalizes to new compositions substantially better than the LSTM, ~7 times the accuracy of predicting structured representations. By providing a concrete method to quantify generalization for unseen combinations, we argue that structured representations and compositional splits are a useful benchmark for image captioning, and advocate compositional models that capture linguistic and visual structure.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
12 papers.
- 2023Linguistic Binding in Diffusion Models: Enhancing Attribute Correspondence through Attention Map Alignmentcited by 171
- 2021A Comprehensive Survey of Scene Graphs: Generation and Applicationcited by 125
- 2022Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Modelscited by 102
- 2022"This is my unicorn, Fluffy": Personalizing frozen vision-language representationscited by 95
- 2023Learning Conditional Attributes for Compositional Zero-Shot Learningcited by 28
- 2023Neural-Logic Human-Object Interaction Detectioncited by 25
- 2025Learning Clustering-based Prototypes for Compositional Zero-shot Learningcited by 14
- 2021The Role of Syntactic Planning in Compositional Image Captioningcited by 12
- 2022ProCC: Progressive Cross-primitive Compatibility for Open-World Compositional Zero-Shot Learningcited by 9
- 2024Language Plays a Pivotal Role in the Object-Attribute Compositional Generalization of CLIPcited by 1
- 2024Next state prediction gives rise to entangled, yet compositional representations of objectscited by 0
- 2025EVA: Mixture-of-Experts Semantic Variant Alignment for Compositional Zero-Shot Learningcited by 0
- 2025EVA: Mixture-of-Experts Semantic Variant Alignment for Compositional Zero-Shot Learning26 Jun 2025
- 2025Learning Clustering-based Prototypes for Compositional Zero-shot Learning10 Feb 2025
- 2024Next state prediction gives rise to entangled, yet compositional representations of objects7 Oct 2024
- 2024Language Plays a Pivotal Role in the Object-Attribute Compositional Generalization of CLIP27 Mar 2024
- 2023Neural-Logic Human-Object Interaction Detection16 Nov 2023
- 2023Linguistic Binding in Diffusion Models: Enhancing Attribute Correspondence through Attention Map Alignment15 Jun 2023
- 2023Learning Conditional Attributes for Compositional Zero-Shot Learning29 May 2023
- 2022Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Models20 Dec 2022
- 2022ProCC: Progressive Cross-primitive Compatibility for Open-World Compositional Zero-Shot Learning19 Nov 2022
- 2022"This is my unicorn, Fluffy": Personalizing frozen vision-language representations4 Apr 2022
- 2021A Comprehensive Survey of Scene Graphs: Generation and Application17 Mar 2021
- 2021The Role of Syntactic Planning in Compositional Image Captioning28 Jan 2021