"Sampling"' as a Baseline Optimizer for Search-based Software Engineering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Increasingly, Software Engineering (SE) researchers use search-based optimization techniques to solve SE problems with multiple conflicting objectives. These techniques often apply CPU-intensive evolutionary algorithms to explore generations of mutations to a population of candidate solutions. An alternative approach, proposed in this paper, is to start with a very large population and sample down to just the better solutions. We call this method "SWAY", short for "the sampling way". Sway is very simple to implement and, in studies with various software engineering models, this sampling approach was found to be competitive with corresponding state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithms while requiring far less computation cost. Considering the simplicity and effectiveness of Sway, we, therefore, propose this approach as a baseline method for search-based software engineering models, especially for models that are very slow to execute.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2026Revealing Domain-Spatiality Patterns for Configuration Tuning: Domain Knowledge Meets Fitness Landscapescited by 5
- 2023Learning from Very Little Data: On the Value of Landscape Analysis for Predicting Software Project Healthcited by 3
- 2026Engineering Reliable Coding Agents: Evaluating and Operating the System Around the Modelcited by 3
- 2023Don't Lie to Me: Avoiding Malicious Explanations with STEALTHcited by 2
- 2025Evaluating Useful Surrogate Models for Configuration Tuning Beyond Accuracy: A Fitness Landscape Analysis Perspectivecited by 1
- 2026When to Use Which? Benchmarking Optimisers for Configurable Systems under Varying Budgetscited by 1
- 2021Fairer Software Made Easier (using "Keys")cited by 0
- 2022A Tale of Two Cities: Data and Configuration Variances in Robust Deep Learningcited by 0
- 2026Engineering Reliable Coding Agents: Evaluating and Operating the System Around the Model14 Aug 2026
- 2026When to Use Which? Benchmarking Optimisers for Configurable Systems under Varying Budgets17 Jul 2026
- 2026Revealing Domain-Spatiality Patterns for Configuration Tuning: Domain Knowledge Meets Fitness Landscapes20 Mar 2026
- 2025Evaluating Useful Surrogate Models for Configuration Tuning Beyond Accuracy: A Fitness Landscape Analysis Perspective26 Sep 2025
- 2023Don't Lie to Me: Avoiding Malicious Explanations with STEALTH25 Jan 2023
- 2023Learning from Very Little Data: On the Value of Landscape Analysis for Predicting Software Project Health16 Jan 2023
- 2022A Tale of Two Cities: Data and Configuration Variances in Robust Deep Learning18 Nov 2022
- 2021Fairer Software Made Easier (using "Keys")11 Jul 2021