mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How many imputations do you need? A two-stage calculation using a quadratic rule

arXiv 1608.05406 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2016stat.MEcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When using multiple imputation, users often want to know how many imputations they need. An old answer is that 2 to 10 imputations usually suffice, but this recommendation only addresses the efficiency of point estimates. You may need more imputations if, in addition to efficient point estimates, you also want standard error (SE) estimates that would not change (much) if you imputed the data again. For replicable SE estimates, the required number of imputations increases quadratically with the fraction of missing information (not linearly, as previous studies have suggested). I recommend a two-stage procedure in which you conduct a pilot analysis using a small-to-moderate number of imputations, then use the results to calculate the number of imputations that are needed for a final analysis whose SE estimates will have the desired level of replicability. I implement the two-stage procedure using a new Stata command called how_many_imputations (available from SSC) and a new SAS macro called %mi_combine (available from the website missingdata.org).

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1.

2 papers.