mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mollifying Networks

arXiv 1608.04980 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2016cs.LG cs.NEcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The optimization of deep neural networks can be more challenging than traditional convex optimization problems due to the highly non-convex nature of the loss function, e.g. it can involve pathological landscapes such as saddle-surfaces that can be difficult to escape for algorithms based on simple gradient descent. In this paper, we attack the problem of optimization of highly non-convex neural networks by starting with a smoothed -- or textitmollified -- objective function that gradually has a more non-convex energy landscape during the training. Our proposition is inspired by the recent studies in continuation methods: similar to curriculum methods, we begin learning an easier (possibly convex) objective function and let it evolve during the training, until it eventually goes back to being the original, difficult to optimize, objective function. The complexity of the mollified networks is controlled by a single hyperparameter which is annealed during the training. We show improvements on various difficult optimization tasks and establish a relationship with recent works on continuation methods for neural networks and mollifiers.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 6; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

10 papers.