Posterior Sampling for Reinforcement Learning Without Episodes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This is a brief technical note to clarify some of the issues with applying the application of the algorithm posterior sampling for reinforcement learning (PSRL) in environments without fixed episodes. In particular, this paper aims to: - Review some of results which have been proven for finite horizon MDPs (Osband et al 2013, 2014a, 2014b, 2016) and also for MDPs with finite ergodic structure (Gopalan et al 2014). - Review similar results for optimistic algorithms in infinite horizon problems (Jaksch et al 2010, Bartlett and Tewari 2009, Abbasi-Yadkori and Szepesvari 2011), with particular attention to the dynamic episode growth. - Highlight the delicate technical issue which has led to a fault in the proof of the lazy-PSRL algorithm (Abbasi-Yadkori and Szepesvari 2015). We present an explicit counterexample to this style of argument. Therefore, we suggest that the Theorem 2 in (Abbasi-Yadkori and Szepesvari 2015) be instead considered a conjecture, as it has no rigorous proof. - Present pragmatic approaches to apply PSRL in infinite horizon problems. We conjecture that, under some additional assumptions, it will be possible to obtain bounds O( √T ) even without episodic reset. We hope that this note serves to clarify existing results in the field of reinforcement learning and provides interesting motivation for future work.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025Toward Efficient Exploration by Large Language Model Agentscited by 17
- 2023Social Contract AI: Aligning AI Assistants with Implicit Group Normscited by 9
- 2023Langevin Thompson Sampling with Logarithmic Communication: Bandits and Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2026Cognitive Models and AI Algorithms Provide Templates for Designing Language Agentscited by 2
- 2024Reinforcement Learning and Regret Bounds for Admission Controlcited by 0
- 2026Evolving Robustness--Exploration Trade-off in Online Reinforcement Learning via Quantile Bayesian Risk MDPscited by 0
- 2026Evolving Robustness--Exploration Trade-off in Online Reinforcement Learning via Quantile Bayesian Risk MDPs23 May 2026
- 2026Cognitive Models and AI Algorithms Provide Templates for Designing Language Agents26 Feb 2026
- 2025Toward Efficient Exploration by Large Language Model Agents29 Apr 2025
- 2024Reinforcement Learning and Regret Bounds for Admission Control7 Jun 2024
- 2023Social Contract AI: Aligning AI Assistants with Implicit Group Norms26 Oct 2023
- 2023Langevin Thompson Sampling with Logarithmic Communication: Bandits and Reinforcement Learning15 Jun 2023