Classifier Risk Estimation under Limited Labeling Resources
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper we propose strategies for estimating performance of a classifier when labels cannot be obtained for the whole test set. The number of test instances which can be labeled is very small compared to the whole test data size. The goal then is to obtain a precise estimate of classifier performance using as little labeling resource as possible. Specifically, we try to answer, how to select a subset of the large test set for labeling such that the performance of a classifier estimated on this subset is as close as possible to the one on the whole test set. We propose strategies based on stratified sampling for selecting this subset. We show that these strategies can reduce the variance in estimation of classifier accuracy by a significant amount compared to simple random sampling (over 65% in several cases). Hence, our proposed methods are much more precise compared to random sampling for accuracy estimation under restricted labeling resources. The reduction in number of samples required (compared to random sampling) to estimate the classifier accuracy with only 1% error is high as 60% in some cases.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2021Active Testing: Sample-Efficient Model Evaluationcited by 82
- 2022Active Surrogate Estimators: An Active Learning Approach to Label-Efficient Model Evaluationcited by 26
- 2023D-CALM: A Dynamic Clustering-based Active Learning Approach for Mitigating Biascited by 12
- 2025Scaling Up Active Testing to Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2024All models are wrong, some are useful: Model Selection with Limited Labelscited by 8
- 2021ALT-MAS: A Data-Efficient Framework for Active Testing of Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4
- 2022CEREAL: Few-Sample Clustering Evaluationcited by 0
- 2025Scaling Up Active Testing to Large Language Models12 Aug 2025
- 2024All models are wrong, some are useful: Model Selection with Limited Labels17 Oct 2024
- 2023D-CALM: A Dynamic Clustering-based Active Learning Approach for Mitigating Bias26 May 2023
- 2022CEREAL: Few-Sample Clustering Evaluation30 Sep 2022
- 2022Active Surrogate Estimators: An Active Learning Approach to Label-Efficient Model Evaluation14 Feb 2022
- 2021ALT-MAS: A Data-Efficient Framework for Active Testing of Machine Learning Algorithms11 Apr 2021
- 2021Active Testing: Sample-Efficient Model Evaluation9 Mar 2021