Deciphering Malware's use of TLS (without Decryption)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The use of TLS by malware poses new challenges to network threat detection because traditional pattern-matching techniques can no longer be applied to its messages. However, TLS also introduces a complex set of observable data features that allow many inferences to be made about both the client and the server. We show that these features can be used to detect and understand malware communication, while at the same time preserving the privacy of benign uses of encryption. These data features also allow for accurate malware family attribution of network communication, even when restricted to a single, encrypted flow. To demonstrate this, we performed a detailed study of how TLS is used by malware and enterprise applications. We provide a general analysis on millions of TLS encrypted flows, and a targeted study on 18 malware families composed of thousands of unique malware samples and ten-of-thousands of malicious TLS flows. Importantly, we identify and accommodate the bias introduced by the use of a malware sandbox. The performance of a malware classifier is correlated with a malware family's use of TLS, i.e., malware families that actively evolve their use of cryptography are more difficult to classify. We conclude that malware's usage of TLS is distinct from benign usage in an enterprise setting, and that these differences can be effectively used in rules and machine learning classifiers.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2022Machine Learning for Encrypted Malicious Traffic Detection: Approaches, Datasets and Comparative Studycited by 6
- 2021Multi-Task Hierarchical Learning Based Network Traffic Analyticscited by 3
- 2023DataZoo: Streamlining Traffic Classification Experimentscited by 2
- 2022SiamHAN: IPv6 Address Correlation Attacks on TLS Encrypted Traffic via Siamese Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 1
- 2022Active Learning Framework to Automate NetworkTraffic Classificationcited by 0
- 2023Feature Analysis of Encrypted Malicious Trafficcited by 0
- 2025Versatile yet Efficient Network Traffic Analysis: Offloading Network Foundation Model to SmartNICcited by 0
- 2026GESR: Graph-Based Edge Semantic Reconstruction for Stealthy Communication Detection with Benign-Only Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Multi-View Fusion for Encrypted C2 Detection: A Leakage-Controlled Measurement Study of Evaluation Pitfallscited by 0
- 2026Multi-View Fusion for Encrypted C2 Detection: A Leakage-Controlled Measurement Study of Evaluation Pitfalls23 Sep 2026
- 2026GESR: Graph-Based Edge Semantic Reconstruction for Stealthy Communication Detection with Benign-Only Training8 May 2026
- 2025Versatile yet Efficient Network Traffic Analysis: Offloading Network Foundation Model to SmartNIC4 Aug 2025
- 2023Feature Analysis of Encrypted Malicious Traffic6 Dec 2023
- 2023DataZoo: Streamlining Traffic Classification Experiments30 Oct 2023
- 2022Active Learning Framework to Automate NetworkTraffic Classification26 Oct 2022
- 2022SiamHAN: IPv6 Address Correlation Attacks on TLS Encrypted Traffic via Siamese Heterogeneous Graph Attention Network20 Apr 2022
- 2022Machine Learning for Encrypted Malicious Traffic Detection: Approaches, Datasets and Comparative Study17 Mar 2022
- 2021Multi-Task Hierarchical Learning Based Network Traffic Analytics5 Jun 2021