A new analytical approach to consistency and overfitting in regularized empirical risk minimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work considers the problem of binary classification: given training data x1, dots, xn from a certain population, together with associated labels y1,dots, yn ∈ left0,1 right, determine the best label for an element x not among the training data. More specifically, this work considers a variant of the regularized empirical risk functional which is defined intrinsically to the observed data and does not depend on the underlying population. Tools from modern analysis are used to obtain a concise proof of asymptotic consistency as regularization parameters are taken to zero at rates related to the size of the sample. These analytical tools give a new framework for understanding overfitting and underfitting, and rigorously connect the notion of overfitting with a loss of compactness.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021The Geometry of Adversarial Training in Binary Classificationcited by 20
- 2023On the existence of solutions to adversarial training in multiclass classificationcited by 9
- 2022Eikonal depth: an optimal control approach to statistical depthscited by 1
- 2025Higher-Order Regularization Learning on Hypergraphscited by 1
- 2025Higher-Order Regularization Learning on Hypergraphs30 Oct 2025
- 2023On the existence of solutions to adversarial training in multiclass classification28 Apr 2023
- 2022Eikonal depth: an optimal control approach to statistical depths14 Jan 2022
- 2021The Geometry of Adversarial Training in Binary Classification26 Nov 2021