mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A new analytical approach to consistency and overfitting in regularized empirical risk minimization

arXiv 1607.00274 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2016math.ST stat.ML stat.THcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work considers the problem of binary classification: given training data x1, dots, xn from a certain population, together with associated labels y1,dots, yn ∈ left0,1 right, determine the best label for an element x not among the training data. More specifically, this work considers a variant of the regularized empirical risk functional which is defined intrinsically to the observed data and does not depend on the underlying population. Tools from modern analysis are used to obtain a concise proof of asymptotic consistency as regularization parameters are taken to zero at rates related to the size of the sample. These analytical tools give a new framework for understanding overfitting and underfitting, and rigorously connect the notion of overfitting with a loss of compactness.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.