Intrinsic Subspace Evaluation of Word Embedding Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce a new methodology for intrinsic evaluation of word representations. Specifically, we identify four fundamental criteria based on the characteristics of natural language that pose difficulties to NLP systems; and develop tests that directly show whether or not representations contain the subspaces necessary to satisfy these criteria. Current intrinsic evaluations are mostly based on the overall similarity or full-space similarity of words and thus view vector representations as points. We show the limits of these point-based intrinsic evaluations. We apply our evaluation methodology to the comparison of a count vector model and several neural network models and demonstrate important properties of these models.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021Multilingual LAMA: Investigating Knowledge in Multilingual Pretrained Language Modelscited by 132
- 2022Metaphors in Pre-Trained Language Models: Probing and Generalization Across Datasets and Languagescited by 30
- 2021Do Language Models Know the Way to Rome?cited by 18
- 2021LMMS Reloaded: Transformer-based Sense Embeddings for Disambiguation and Beyondcited by 17
- 2021PolyLM: Learning about Polysemy through Language Modelingcited by 5
- 2022Metaphors in Pre-Trained Language Models: Probing and Generalization Across Datasets and Languages26 Mar 2022
- 2021Do Language Models Know the Way to Rome?16 Sep 2021
- 2021LMMS Reloaded: Transformer-based Sense Embeddings for Disambiguation and Beyond26 May 2021
- 2021Multilingual LAMA: Investigating Knowledge in Multilingual Pretrained Language Models1 Feb 2021
- 2021PolyLM: Learning about Polysemy through Language Modeling25 Jan 2021