Acquisition of Visual Features Through Probabilistic Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The final version of this paper has been published in IEEEXplore available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7727213. Please cite this paper as: Amirhossein Tavanaei, Timothee Masquelier, and Anthony Maida, Acquisition of visual features through probabilistic spike-timing-dependent plasticity. IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. pp. 307-314, IJCNN 2016. This paper explores modifications to a feedforward five-layer spiking convolutional network (SCN) of the ventral visual stream [Masquelier, T., Thorpe, S., Unsupervised learning of visual features through spike timing dependent plasticity. PLoS Computational Biology, 3(2), 247-257]. The original model showed that a spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) learning algorithm embedded in an appropriately selected SCN could perform unsupervised feature discovery. The discovered features where interpretable and could effectively be used to perform rapid binary decisions in a classifier. In order to study the robustness of the previous results, the present research examines the effects of modifying some of the components of the original model. For improved biological realism, we replace the original non-leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with Izhikevich-like neurons. We also replace the original STDP rule with a novel rule that has a probabilistic interpretation. The probabilistic STDP slightly but significantly improves the performance for both types of model neurons. Use of the Izhikevich-like neuron was not found to improve performance although performance was still comparable to the IF neuron. This shows that the model is robust enough to handle more biologically realistic neurons. We also conclude that the underlying reasons for stable performance in the model are preserved despite the overt changes to the explicit components of the model.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Spiking Neural Networks and Bio-Inspired Supervised Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 8
- 2021An optimised deep spiking neural network architecture without gradientscited by 4
- 2025Edge Intelligence with Spiking Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2023Efficient Implementation of a Multi-Layer Gradient-Free Online-Trainable Spiking Neural Network on FPGAcited by 1
- 2021Enhancing efficiency of object recognition in different categorization levels by reinforcement learning in modular spiking neural networkscited by 0
- 2025Edge Intelligence with Spiking Neural Networks18 Jul 2025
- 2023Spiking Neural Networks and Bio-Inspired Supervised Deep Learning: A Survey30 Jul 2023
- 2023Efficient Implementation of a Multi-Layer Gradient-Free Online-Trainable Spiking Neural Network on FPGA31 May 2023
- 2021An optimised deep spiking neural network architecture without gradients27 Sep 2021
- 2021Enhancing efficiency of object recognition in different categorization levels by reinforcement learning in modular spiking neural networks10 Feb 2021