mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Breaching the Human Firewall: Social engineering in Phishing and Spear-Phishing Emails

arXiv 1606.00887 ↗First posted 28 May 2016cs.CY cs.CRcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We examined the influence of three social engineering strategies on users' judgments of how safe it is to click on a link in an email. The three strategies examined were authority, scarcity and social proof, and the emails were either genuine, phishing or spear-phishing. Of the three strategies, the use of authority was the most effective strategy in convincing users that a link in an email was safe. When detecting phishing and spear-phishing emails, users performed the worst when the emails used the authority principle and performed best when social proof was present. Overall, users struggled to distinguish between genuine and spear-phishing emails. Finally, users who were less impulsive in making decisions generally were less likely to judge a link as safe in the fraudulent emails. Implications for education and training are discussed.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 May 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.