Neural Dataset Generality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Often the filters learned by Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) from different datasets appear similar. This is prominent in the first few layers. This similarity of filters is being exploited for the purposes of transfer learning and some studies have been made to analyse such transferability of features. This is also being used as an initialization technique for different tasks in the same dataset or for the same task in similar datasets. Off-the-shelf CNN features have capitalized on this idea to promote their networks as best transferable and most general and are used in a cavalier manner in day-to-day computer vision tasks. It is curious that while the filters learned by these CNNs are related to the atomic structures of the images from which they are learnt, all datasets learn similar looking low-level filters. With the understanding that a dataset that contains many such atomic structures learn general filters and are therefore useful to initialize other networks with, we propose a way to analyse and quantify generality among datasets from their accuracies on transferred filters. We applied this metric on several popular character recognition, natural image and a medical image dataset, and arrived at some interesting conclusions. On further experimentation we also discovered that particular classes in a dataset themselves are more general than others.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 May 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Differentially Private Natural Gradient Descentcited by 0
- 2026Differentially Private Natural Gradient Descent7 Jul 2026