mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Active Uncertainty Calibration in Bayesian ODE Solvers

arXiv 1605.03364 ↗First posted 11 May 2016math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is resurging interest, in statistics and machine learning, in solvers for ordinary differential equations (ODEs) that return probability measures instead of point estimates. Recently, Conrad et al. introduced a sampling-based class of methods that are 'well-calibrated' in a specific sense. But the computational cost of these methods is significantly above that of classic methods. On the other hand, Schober et al. pointed out a precise connection between classic Runge-Kutta ODE solvers and Gaussian filters, which gives only a rough probabilistic calibration, but at negligible cost overhead. By formulating the solution of ODEs as approximate inference in linear Gaussian SDEs, we investigate a range of probabilistic ODE solvers, that bridge the trade-off between computational cost and probabilistic calibration, and identify the inaccurate gradient measurement as the crucial source of uncertainty. We propose the novel filtering-based method Bayesian Quadrature filtering (BQF) which uses Bayesian quadrature to actively learn the imprecision in the gradient measurement by collecting multiple gradient evaluations.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 May 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

9 papers.