mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Avoiding Wireheading with Value Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 1605.03143 ↗First posted 10 May 2016cs.AIcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

How can we design good goals for arbitrarily intelligent agents? Reinforcement learning (RL) is a natural approach. Unfortunately, RL does not work well for generally intelligent agents, as RL agents are incentivised to shortcut the reward sensor for maximum reward -- the so-called wireheading problem. In this paper we suggest an alternative to RL called value reinforcement learning (VRL). In VRL, agents use the reward signal to learn a utility function. The VRL setup allows us to remove the incentive to wirehead by placing a constraint on the agent's actions. The constraint is defined in terms of the agent's belief distributions, and does not require an explicit specification of which actions constitute wireheading.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 May 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2019: 2; 2020: 0; 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: