mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Online Isotonic Regression

arXiv 1603.04190 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2016cs.LG stat.MLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the online version of the isotonic regression problem. Given a set of linearly ordered points (e.g., on the real line), the learner must predict labels sequentially at adversarially chosen positions and is evaluated by her total squared loss compared against the best isotonic (non-decreasing) function in hindsight. We survey several standard online learning algorithms and show that none of them achieve the optimal regret exponent; in fact, most of them (including Online Gradient Descent, Follow the Leader and Exponential Weights) incur linear regret. We then prove that the Exponential Weights algorithm played over a covering net of isotonic functions has a regret bounded by Obig(T1/3 log2/3(T)big) and present a matching Omega(T1/3) lower bound on regret. We provide a computationally efficient version of this algorithm. We also analyze the noise-free case, in which the revealed labels are isotonic, and show that the bound can be improved to O(log T) or even to O(1) (when the labels are revealed in isotonic order). Finally, we extend the analysis beyond squared loss and give bounds for entropic loss and absolute loss.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

9 papers.