Determination of the edge of criticality in echo state networks through Fisher information maximization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is a widely accepted fact that the computational capability of recurrent neural networks is maximized on the so-called "edge of criticality". Once the network operates in this configuration, it performs efficiently on a specific application both in terms of (i) low prediction error and (ii) high short-term memory capacity. Since the behavior of recurrent networks is strongly influenced by the particular input signal driving the dynamics, a universal, application-independent method for determining the edge of criticality is still missing. In this paper, we aim at addressing this issue by proposing a theoretically motivated, unsupervised method based on Fisher information for determining the edge of criticality in recurrent neural networks. It is proven that Fisher information is maximized for (finite-size) systems operating in such critical regions. However, Fisher information is notoriously difficult to compute and either requires the probability density function or the conditional dependence of the system states with respect to the model parameters. The paper takes advantage of a recently-developed non-parametric estimator of the Fisher information matrix and provides a method to determine the critical region of echo state networks, a particular class of recurrent networks. The considered control parameters, which indirectly affect the echo state network performance, are explored to identify those configurations lying on the edge of criticality and, as such, maximizing Fisher information and computational performance. Experimental results on benchmarks and real-world data demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 4.
12 papers.
- 2021Next Generation Reservoir Computingcited by 160
- 2021Exploiting Multiple Timescales in Hierarchical Echo State Networkscited by 11
- 2022Quantifying Relevance in Learning and Inferencecited by 5
- 2023Memory of recurrent networks: Do we compute it right?cited by 5
- 2023Edge of stability echo state networkscited by 4
- 2025Fisher information flow in artificial neural networkscited by 3
- 2021ViR:the Vision Reservoircited by 2
- 2025Minimal Deterministic Echo State Networks Outperform Random Reservoirs in Learning Chaotic Dynamicscited by 2
- 2025Toward a Physics of Deep Learning and Brainscited by 1
- 2021Phase Transition Adaptationcited by 0
- 2023Criticality Analysis: Bio-inspired Nonlinear Data Representationcited by 0
- 2025Federated Koopman-Reservoir Learning for Large-Scale Multivariate Time-Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 0
- 2025Toward a Physics of Deep Learning and Brains26 Sep 2025
- 2025Fisher information flow in artificial neural networks2 Sep 2025
- 2025Minimal Deterministic Echo State Networks Outperform Random Reservoirs in Learning Chaotic Dynamics8 Jul 2025
- 2025Federated Koopman-Reservoir Learning for Large-Scale Multivariate Time-Series Anomaly Detection14 Mar 2025
- 2023Edge of stability echo state networks5 Aug 2023
- 2023Criticality Analysis: Bio-inspired Nonlinear Data Representation11 May 2023
- 2023Memory of recurrent networks: Do we compute it right?2 May 2023
- 2022Quantifying Relevance in Learning and Inference1 Feb 2022
- 2021ViR:the Vision Reservoir27 Dec 2021
- 2021Next Generation Reservoir Computing14 Jun 2021
- 2021Phase Transition Adaptation20 Apr 2021
- 2021Exploiting Multiple Timescales in Hierarchical Echo State Networks11 Jan 2021