Generalization error bounds for learning to rank: Does the length of document lists matter?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the generalization ability of algorithms for learning to rank at a query level, a problem also called subset ranking. Existing generalization error bounds necessarily degrade as the size of the document list associated with a query increases. We show that such a degradation is not intrinsic to the problem. For several loss functions, including the cross-entropy loss used in the well known ListNet method, there is no degradation in generalization ability as document lists become longer. We also provide novel generalization error bounds under ℓ1 regularization and faster convergence rates if the loss function is smooth.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Generalization Analysis for Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 25
- 2022Anchor Sampling for Federated Learning with Partial Client Participationcited by 14
- 2024Offline Model-Based Optimization by Learning to Rankcited by 13
- 2023On the Learnability of Multilabel Rankingcited by 2
- 2024Offline Model-Based Optimization by Learning to Rank15 Oct 2024
- 2023On the Learnability of Multilabel Ranking6 Apr 2023
- 2023Generalization Analysis for Contrastive Representation Learning24 Feb 2023
- 2022Anchor Sampling for Federated Learning with Partial Client Participation13 Jun 2022